Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Hitler to Zio-Nazis is confronting the Wise person of Middle East Formula for Peace,

Hitler to Zio-Nazis is confronting the Wise person of Middle East Formula for Peace,

Sunday, April 1, 2007

Middle East Formula for Peace

Middle East Formula for Peace (destroyed by Zionised people of Sydney Indy Media) (2nd time)

Arizona, Arkansas, Austin, Cleveland, Colorado, Indy Bay, Iraq, New Hampshire, Richmond, Winipeg, South Africa,

Dr. Bouthania Shaaban was speaking at Macquarie University on the 8th September 2006. Her speech was interesting, revealing and full of commonsense. She gave us a few details on how and why the Middle East peace process is not moving forward. She reminded us that the Israel centric, senseless and dangerous American policy (i.e. diplomacy of coercion) to force Arab countries into submission is illegal, immoral and unacceptable by all measures. During the discussion session, many good academics and writers made some positive contributions. The second last speaker was good old Faruque Ahmed.

Faruque Ahmed: Dr. Shaaban, thanks for your diplomatic and informative talk. However, Ill talk straight because I am a street worker and I dont like round about language. You see, overseas people like you think we are free and fair dinkum here! The fact is totally opposite. In reality, our media, politicians and most instrumentalities are beneath Israeli feet. (There were a few red and impatient faces amongst the audience who could easily be traced. Then however, Faruque continued). No Prime Minister or power broker of this country has the guts to speak out against Israeli war crimes and genocides. For undeniable evidence to support my claim, I would like to request you to look at the map (He did so by pointing at a bunch of documents he delivered to the Minister a few minutes earlier). Such a map continues to be completely absent from our mainstream media.

This was Ehud Baraks supposed genuine offer made at the Camp David talks and as noted above, you wont be able to find this map printed anywhere in this country. Examining this map clearly shows, the Camp David offer to be a hoax and a recipe for disaster. Ever since, everyone has been unfairly blaming the poor Palestinians for not accepting this unacceptable and ludicrous offer. You wont even be able to raise or discuss this issue properly or freely in Australia without being branded as an anti-Semite.

The United Nations, as well as many Presidents, Prime Minsters and Minsters such as your-self have been trying to bring about peace in the Middle East for the last sixty years. All of you have failed spectacularly and miserably. Sixty years went by, whilst many wars and many rivers of blood continue to give us nothing but bitterness and hatred. Therefore, it is time for people like you to step aside and listen to us. We will show you how to bring peace in the Middle East.

You see, in recent history the Pakistani nuclear bomb has been maintaining peace and stability in the sub-continent. This is undeniable evidence of how human natures response to deterrents can help bring about and maintain peace.

The illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq forced North Korea to become nuclear to deter American threat. Again, I believe that this has assisted us in maintaining peace and stability in the Korean peninsula.

Right now, Nazi Zionist Israel is armed to its teeth whilst the poor Palestinians have a few Kalashnikovs hidden in their underwear. Thats why Israel can afford to break and or ignore any law, moral code or form of justice altogether and attack anyone at anytime without fear of any consequences whatsoever. However, if we can provide similar or comparable types of arms to the people of both Palestine and Lebanon, there will be peace in the Middle East instantly. Because of their mutual quest for survival, the Israelis, Lebanese and Palestinians will be prompted to sit together and work out a viable and lasting solution to their problems. Otherwise, you wont see peace in the Middle East at all.

(The crowd cheered Faruque). Furthermore, Palestine and Lebanon are not the only victims of zionised American Terrorism, Egypt, Iran, Libya, Iraq are also victims.

Faruque Ahmed, Sydney, Australia, Mobile: 041 091 4118




OK.NOWwhat said...

gee, faruque. doing your bit for jihad and anti-semitism in your own tiny little way, aren't ya?

your formula seem to entail getting rid of everyone who doesn't agree with you. some formula. and so typical. i'm sure Australia is proud to have your sorry ass on their soil. i always enjoy so much muslims mouthing off about the west while firmly implanting their little feet in western soil. if you so strongly beieve that your way is the right way, why not toddle back to whichever sorry middle eastern contry you come from and spew your hate from there.

and don't let the screen door hit you in the ass as you leave the West, you misogynistic Jew-hater.

May 11, 2007 5:20 AM

Austro_Bangla said...

Articles like Middle East Formula for Peace
have been damaged by Nazi Zionists in several times at several places! They do not have the gumption to debate the issue. They are gutless wonders indeed.

June 15, 2007 5:38 AM

OK.NOWwhat said...

Hey, Austro Bangla (-deshi??)I really enjoyed reading one of your many blogs "Who Deserve Gas Chambers."

Nazi Zionists. You people kill me. Careful or you'll be strangled by your own twisted syntax.

Um...can I watch?

Oh, wait. Muslims really DO want to kill me.

Not to mention killing each other. Long live Palestine! What a joke. One wonders whether there will be any Palestinians left after the Muslim "brothers" are finished slaughtering their own in Gaza and Lebanon. And everywhere else the Muslim Blight exists.

The world should build a wall around the Muslim World and just let you fools kill each other. Then the rest of us can get on with living peaceful and happy lives without the aggravation of having to wonder whether the pizza shop we're in is going to be blown up by some sex-starved Arab misfit or that the building we're working in will be crashed into by a plane driven by some equally sex-starved Muslim hypocrit who drinks booze and watches naked women dance on the eve of their "martyrdom."

Know what? I think little Faruque has abandoned yet ANOTHER of his silly little blog sites here and has moved on to create another NEW one. Just like his pal Austro_bangla. The men of many blogsites. I think this one will be named "I Love America" or something equally disingenuous.

Or...let me see..."Australia is a Zionist Nazi State." Or "I'm Only Here Because My Own Country Sucks and Is Stuck in the 10th Century." Or even "I Hate All Jews and Asians and White People. Also Women."

Or how about "God is Great. He Taught Me to Hate."

Or maybe "I'd Become a Martyr for Allah Myself, But YOU know, I'm Like Working on my Masters Here in Sydney...."

Or "Martyrdom: The Extreme and Only Solution for the Horny Muslim Male."

Sink back into the primordial slime from which you have emerged.

Can I watch?

June 18, 2007 5:40 AM

Austro_Bangla said...

This post has been removed by the author.

October 31, 2007 5:12 AM

Austro_Bangla said...

Wise person,

Stop deluding yourself by using pointless rhetoric and stick to the point.

O.K. Let’s arm the people of Palestine like the Zionist Israelis as per my proposal in the Middle East Formula for Peace! Stop killing unarmed women and children in their backyards, school yards and bed rooms with tanks, machine guns, apache helicopters and F 18s! Because Zionist actions are legitimizing Hitler’s treatment towards them as the only and LEGITIMATE ACTION to control Zionist poison to save the world.

Also, stop demonizing Muslims and Arabs by using Hitler’s tricks and techniques! Because, these blatant and aggressive Zionist conspiracies as well as CONGENITAL vendettas are again legitimizing Hitler’s “kindness and compassion” towards “Jews”. You can’t have both ways!

Behave or get ready for the LONG OVERDUE real holocaust!

For the full story please visit the link below
Hitler to Zio-Nazis

October 31, 2007 5:15 AM

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

The Big Lie: ‘Iran Is a Threat’

The Big Lie: ‘Iran Is a Threat’

Again, the "Christ Killer Jews" used to be hated by Europe and Muslims used to protect them! Today, the ungrateful "Jews" have been conspiring crusades against Muslim in everywhere.

Today, enslaved Americans are fighting and dying like to dogs to protect Zionist criminal empires like the well-known WW2 saga below!

"We Jews are going to bring war on Germany." - David Brown, President of American Hebrew, in 1934, quoted in Edmonson's I Testify, page 188.

"The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism." - The Chicago Jewish Sentinel, October 8, 1942.

--- In, "bruceksim" wrote:
Re: The Big Lie: `Iran Is a Threat'

I think you may be overating yourself as a fighting force knucklehead!! This time you will not be slaughtering women and kids but well trained soldiers. The Jews managed to knock you stupid every time you had a crack at them, outnumbered and outgunned as they were!!

Cheers Bruce

--- In, "mukto_mona" wrote:Re: The Big Lie: `Iran Is a Threat'

An attack of Iran will expose America very badly and then they will die like dogs and cats for nothing.

--- In, "mamubhi" wrote:Re: The Big Lie: `Iran Is a Threat'

Our Moral Rights and American Duty are two carcinogenic clusters in USA, UK and Australia.

Remember Iraq pullout would hurt Israel and Iraq Was Invaded to Secure Israel!

--- In, "Jodie" wrote:The Big Lie: `Iran Is a Threat'By Scott Ritter

10/08/07 "Common Dreams" -- -- Iran has never manifested itself as a serious threat to the national security of the United States, or by extension as a security threat to global security. At the height of Iran's "exportation of the Islamic Revolution" phase, in the mid-1980's, the Islamic Republic demonstrated a less-than-impressive ability to project its power beyond the immediate borders of Iran, and even then this projection was limited to war-torn Lebanon.
Iranian military capability reached its modern peak in the late 1970's, during the reign of Reza Shah Pahlevi. The combined effects of institutional distrust on the part of the theocrats who currently govern the Islamic Republic of Iran concerning the conventional military institutions, leading as it did to the decay of the military through inadequate funding and the creation of a competing paramilitary organization, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Command (IRGC), and the disastrous impact of an eight-year conflict with Iraq, meant that Iran has never been able to build up conventional military power capable of significant regional power projection, let alone global power projection.

Where Iran has demonstrated the ability for global reach is in the spread of Shi'a Islamic fundamentalism, but even in this case the results have been mixed. Other than the expansive relations between Iran (via certain elements of the IRGC) and the Hezbollah movement in Lebanon, Iranian success stories when it comes to exporting the Islamic revolution are virtually non-existent. Indeed, the efforts on the part of the IRGC to export Islamic revolution abroad, especially into Europe and other western nations, have produced the opposite effect desired. Based upon observations made by former and current IRGC officers, it appears that those operatives chosen to spread the revolution in fact more often than not returned to Iran noting that peaceful coexistence with the West was not only possible but preferable to the exportation of Islamic fundamentalism. Many of these IRGC officers began to push for moderation of the part of the ruling theocrats in Iran, both in terms of interfacing with the west and domestic policies.

The concept of an inherent incompatibility between Iran, even when governed by a theocratic ruling class, and the United States is fundamentally flawed, especially from the perspective of Iran. The Iran of today seeks to integrate itself responsibly with the nations of the world, clumsily so in some instances, but in any case a far cry from the crude attempts to export Islamic revolution in the early 1980's. The United States claims that Iran is a real and present danger to the security of the US and the entire world, and cites Iranian efforts to acquire nuclear technology, Iran's continued support of Hezbollah in Lebanon, Iran's "status" as a state supporter of terror, and Iranian interference into the internal affairs of Iraq and Afghanistan as the prime examples of how this threat manifests itself.

On every point, the case made against Iran collapses upon closer scrutiny. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), mandated to investigate Iran's nuclear programs, has concluded that there is no evidence that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program. Furthermore, the IAEA has concluded that it is capable of monitoring the Iranian nuclear program to ensure that it does not deviate from the permitted nuclear energy program Iran states to be the exclusive objective of its endeavors. Iran's support of the Hezbollah Party in Lebanon - Iranian protestors shown here supporting Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah during an anti-Israel rally - while a source of concern for the State of Israel, does not constitute a threat to American national security primarily because the support provided is primarily defensive in nature, designed to assist Hezbollah in deterring and repelling an Israeli assault of sovereign Lebanese territory. Similarly, the bulk of the data used by the United States to substantiate the claims that Iran is a state sponsor of terror is derived from the aforementioned support provided to Hezbollah. Other arguments presented are either grossly out of date (going back to the early 1980's when Iran was in fact exporting Islamic fundamentalism) or unsubstantiated by fact.

The US claims concerning Iranian interference in both Iraq and Afghanistan ignore the reality that both nations border Iran, both nations were invaded and occupied by the United States, not Iran, and that Iran has a history of conflict with both nations that dictates a keen interest concerning the internal domestic affairs of both nations. The United States continues to exaggerate the nature of Iranian involvement in Iraq, arresting "intelligence operatives" who later turned out to be economic and diplomatic officials invited to Iraq by the Iraqi government itself. Most if not all the claims made by the United States concerning Iranian military involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan have not been backed up with anything stronger than rhetoric, and more often than not are subsequently contradicted by other military and governmental officials, citing a lack of specific evidence.

Iran as a nation represents absolutely no threat to the national security of the United States, or of its major allies in the region, including Israel. The media hype concerning alleged statements made by Iran's President Ahmadinejad has created and sustained the myth that Iran seeks the destruction of the State of Israel. Two points of fact directly contradict this myth. First and foremost, Ahmadinejad never articulated an Iranian policy objective to destroy Israel, rather noting that Israel's policies would lead to its "vanishing from the pages of time." Second, and perhaps most important, Ahmadinejad does not make foreign policy decisions on the part of the Islamic Republic of Iran. This is the sole purview of the "Supreme Leader," the Ayatollah Khomeini. In 2003 Khomeini initiated a diplomatic outreach to the United States inclusive of an offer to recognize Israel's right to exist. This initiative was rejected by the United States, but nevertheless represents the clearest indication of what the true policy objective of Iran is vis-à-vis Israel.

The fact of the matter is that the "Iranian Threat" is derived solely from the rhetoric of those who appear to seek confrontation between the United States and Iran, and largely divorced from fact-based reality. A recent request on the part of Iran to allow President Ahmadinejad to lay a wreath at "ground zero" in Manhattan was rejected by New York City officials. The resulting public outcry condemned the Iranian initiative as an affront to all Americans, citing Iran's alleged policies of supporting terrorism. This knee-jerk reaction ignores the reality that Iran was violently opposed to al-Qaeda's presence in Afghanistan throughout the 1990's leading up to 2001, and that Iran was one of the first Muslim nations to condemn the terror attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001.

A careful fact-based assessment of Iran clearly demonstrates that it poses no threat to the legitimate national security interests of the United States. However, if the United States chooses to implement its own unilateral national security objectives concerning regime change in Iran, there will most likely be a reaction from Iran which produces an exceedingly detrimental impact on the national security interests of the United States, including military, political and economic. But the notion of claiming a nation like Iran to constitute a security threat simply because it retains the intent and capability to defend its sovereign territory in the face of unprovoked military aggression is absurd. In the end, however, such absurdity is trumping fact-based reality when it comes to shaping the opinion of the American public on the issue of the Iranian "threat."

Scott Ritter was a Marine Corps intelligence officer from 1984 to 1991 and a United Nations weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991 to 1998. He is the author of numerous books, including "Iraq Confidential" (Nation Books, 2005) , "Target Iran" (Nation Books, 2006) and his latest, "Waging Peace: The Art of War for the Antiwar Movement" (Nation Books, April 2007)

Source: Free America Now